How to publish in European academic journals - Featured

How to Publish in European Academic Journals: A Practical Guide

by

Table of Contents

Introduction

Publishing in European academic journals can be both a rewarding and challenging endeavor. While the opportunities for global recognition, academic collaboration, and career advancement are significant, the pathway is often filled with unfamiliar expectations, cultural nuances, and rigorous quality standards. European journals—from those published by large commercial entities to niche society-run titles—are widely respected across disciplines for their commitment to methodological soundness, peer review integrity, and scholarly impact.

This practical guide aims to demystify the publishing process for those targeting journals based in Europe. While many fundamentals of academic publishing remain consistent across continents, certain regional characteristics in Europe can influence how research is received, reviewed, and disseminated. These include differences in language preferences, open access mandates, editorial policies, and even subtle shifts in thematic emphasis across disciplines.

The article will walk through each phase of the publishing process: from selecting the right journal and preparing your manuscript, to understanding peer review, addressing revisions, and navigating copyright and open access models. The aim is to equip authors, especially those from outside Europe, with a comprehensive and grounded understanding of how to succeed in this publishing ecosystem.

Understanding the European Publishing Landscape

Europe hosts a diverse ecosystem of academic publishers, including commercial giants like Springer Nature, Elsevier, and Taylor & Francis, as well as independent academic presses, university publishers, and scholarly societies. Within this mix lies a spectrum of journal types: hybrid, fully open access, subscription-based, and diamond open access journals (no fees for authors or readers). The European Commission’s support for initiatives like Plan S has also pushed the region further into open science practices.

Language remains a defining characteristic. While English is the lingua franca for most European journals, many countries maintain strong academic traditions in their native languages. Journals from France, Germany, Spain, and Italy may still publish in dual-language formats or welcome contributions in their national languages, especially in the humanities and social sciences. Understanding this balance can help researchers determine where their work best fits and how to frame it for a European readership.

Beyond the linguistic factor, disciplinary focus also plays a role. For instance, Scandinavian journals often prioritize socially engaged research, while Central European journals may emphasize historical and theoretical depth. Researchers should align their submissions with the thematic interests and epistemological traditions of their target journal’s region.

Choosing the Right Journal

Choosing a suitable journal is the foundation of successful academic publishing. In the European context, researchers must consider factors beyond just the journal impact factor or indexing. It’s important to assess the journal’s scope, editorial board, geographical focus, and publication model.

Start by thoroughly reviewing recent issues of the journal to get a sense of the type of articles they publish. Note the methodologies, theoretical frameworks, and writing styles commonly used. European journals often have specific expectations for methodological transparency and ethical disclosures—reviewing published articles can clarify these unwritten norms.

It’s also worth investigating the journal’s policies on author rights, peer review timelines, and open access options. Many European journals, particularly those funded through public or consortia-based models, emphasize ethical publishing practices and may have stricter anti-plagiarism measures than some international counterparts.

Finally, assess logistical elements such as manuscript length, turnaround times, and frequency of publication. While some European journals boast quick review cycles, others—especially those run by scholarly societies—may operate on a slower, more deliberative timeline.

Writing for a European Audience

Crafting a manuscript that resonates with a European readership often requires a degree of cultural and intellectual calibration. Although English is the dominant publication language, European academic writing tends to be less direct and more nuanced compared to North American styles. There’s often a greater emphasis on contextual framing, methodological grounding, and theoretical reflection.

Authors should avoid adopting a one-size-fits-all approach. For example, Scandinavian journals in education or health sciences may prioritize community engagement and qualitative rigor. In contrast, journals in economics or engineering across the EU may emphasize quantitative sophistication and policy relevance. Tailoring your manuscript’s framing to match these intellectual currents enhances its chances of acceptance.

Additionally, referencing European literature can strengthen your manuscript’s appeal. While your research may be global in scope, acknowledging key European thinkers, frameworks, and previous studies can demonstrate your integration into the scholarly dialogue relevant to the region.

Writing style also matters. Clarity, precision, and coherence are universally valued, but European journals often tolerate—and even expect—a more formal tone and deeper engagement with theoretical implications. Avoid colloquial language, overstatements, or excessive self-citation. Use discipline-appropriate terminology, but avoid jargon that might alienate readers from other parts of Europe or interdisciplinary backgrounds.

Submission and Peer Review

Submitting to a European journal involves more than just uploading a PDF. Most journals now operate through editorial management platforms like Editorial Manager, ScholarOne, or Open Journal Systems (OJS). Familiarize yourself with these systems and prepare to provide multiple submission elements: abstract, keywords, cover letter, ethical compliance statements, and possibly a structured data availability statement.

Peer review in European journals is typically double-blind, although some journals adopt open or single-blind models. Review timelines can vary from a few weeks to several months. It’s crucial to treat reviewer comments as an opportunity for growth. Respond with a respectful and comprehensive rebuttal letter that addresses each point raised. Avoid defensiveness; show appreciation and genuine effort to improve the manuscript. In many European academic cultures, humility and collaboration are valued during revision.

Sometimes, you may be invited to revise and resubmit multiple times. This is not necessarily a negative outcome; many journals see revision as part of a dialogic process. As long as you engage meaningfully and continue to improve your work, the chances of acceptance remain high.

Europe is a frontrunner in the global open access movement. With initiatives like Plan S and support from institutions like the European Research Council, authors are increasingly expected to make their research openly accessible. Many European journals now offer hybrid models or are fully open access, often supported by Article Processing Charges (APCs) or institutional agreements.

Before submission, investigate whether your institution has existing publishing agreements with the journal’s publisher. Many European universities participate in “transformative agreements” that allow authors to publish open access without directly paying APCs. Knowing this can save considerable time and money.

European copyright norms also differ slightly from those of other regions. Some journals allow authors to retain copyright and publish under Creative Commons licenses, while others still use traditional copyright transfer agreements. Authors should carefully review these policies and understand their implications for future reuse and dissemination.

Compliance with EU data management and open science mandates is essential for publicly funded research. Be prepared to provide access to data, methodologies, and any supplementary materials, often through institutional repositories or data-sharing platforms.

Ethical Considerations and Research Integrity

Ethics plays a central role in the European academic publishing process. Authors are expected to uphold high standards of research integrity, including full disclosure of funding sources, conflicts of interest, and ethical clearance for human or animal studies.

European journals are particularly vigilant against misconduct such as plagiarism, data fabrication, and salami slicing. Plagiarism detection software is routinely used, and authors found guilty of misconduct may face permanent bans from future submissions. Journals also often require ethical approval documentation and adherence to guidelines such as the Declaration of Helsinki or the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity.

Transparency is another key theme. You may be asked to share anonymized data, submit detailed methodology appendices, or adhere to the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data principles. These are not mere bureaucratic requirements—they reflect the region’s growing commitment to reproducible and responsible research.

Collaborating with European Scholars

One effective strategy to improve your chances of publishing in European journals is collaborating with European scholars. Not only can this increase the credibility and reach of your work, but it also provides invaluable insight into local expectations and academic culture.

Joint research projects, conference presentations, and editorial invitations are all fruitful avenues for such collaboration. European research networks and Erasmus+ programs can also serve as platforms for initiating or strengthening partnerships.

How to publish in European academic journals - Research collaboration

When co-authoring with European colleagues, be open to different writing styles, expectations, and decision-making processes. Building trust and maintaining open communication are key to successful collaboration. Moreover, contributions should be clearly defined, and all authors must approve the final manuscript before submission.

Responding to Rejection and Revising for Other Journals

Rejection is part of the publishing journey, even for seasoned academics. European journals, especially those with high impact or narrow scopes, often reject more than 70% of submissions. Don’t take it personally.

Instead, use the feedback (if provided) to strengthen your manuscript for submission elsewhere. If the feedback was vague or non-existent, consider seeking input from a colleague or mentor familiar with the European publishing context. A fresh perspective can highlight gaps or weaknesses you may have missed.

When resubmitting to another journal, ensure the manuscript aligns with the new journal’s aims and style. You may need to adjust citations, reframe your arguments, or revise your abstract to meet the new audience’s expectations. A hasty resubmission without proper tailoring often leads to repeat rejection.

Staying Informed and Continuing the Journey

Publishing in Europe is not a one-time goal—it’s an evolving process that demands ongoing learning and adaptation. Stay informed by subscribing to journal newsletters, attending European academic conferences, and following editors or journals on platforms like LinkedIn and ResearchGate.

Work on building a publishing portfolio that includes a mix of journals from different regions and levels of impact. Don’t obsess over impact factors alone; many highly regarded European journals operate outside the traditional metrics and are influential within their fields.

It also helps to become familiar with the broader academic landscape—funding opportunities, research priorities, and emerging themes in Europe. These insights can guide your future research in directions that resonate with the region’s academic community and policy priorities.

Conclusion

Successfully publishing in European academic journals is both a professional milestone and a gateway to deeper academic engagement. While the process involves navigating unfamiliar expectations and rigorous standards, the rewards—credibility, collaboration, and visibility—make the effort worthwhile. By understanding the European publishing landscape, tailoring your manuscript to fit both content and cultural expectations, and approaching peer review with humility and persistence, you can position yourself for lasting success.

This guide has outlined practical steps to help you choose the right journal, write effectively for a European audience, navigate submission processes, and handle post-submission outcomes. While no single formula guarantees publication, an informed, strategic, and respectful approach will always improve your chances. The European academic publishing scene is open, dynamic, and intellectually vibrant—an exciting space for researchers ready to engage with it on its own terms.

Leave a comment