Best practices in managing academic journals - Featured

Instituting Best Practices in Managing Academic Journals

by

Table of Contents

Introduction

Academic journals are a cornerstone of scholarly communication. They provide a structured platform for sharing original research, reviewing new findings, and preserving the academic record. However, as the publishing landscape rapidly evolves—pushed by open access movements, technological advances, and increasing scrutiny around research ethics—journal management practices must also adapt. Editors, publishers, and journal administrators face a complex challenge: balancing tradition with innovation, maintaining rigorous standards while ensuring inclusivity, and navigating financial sustainability without compromising scholarly integrity.

This article explores best practices in managing academic journals to improve quality, visibility, and long-term viability. Drawing on current trends, practical experiences, and the collective wisdom of the scholarly publishing community, it aims to offer a comprehensive guide to editors and journal teams committed to elevating their journals to the highest professional standards.

Defining Editorial Scope and Objectives Clearly

One of the most foundational elements of managing an academic journal effectively is defining a clear editorial scope and mission. This scope sets the parameters for what the journal will publish, and just as importantly, what it will not. A well-articulated scope also helps authors determine the suitability of their submissions and guides peer reviewers and readers in understanding the journal’s positioning within the broader academic discourse.

A robust editorial scope should go beyond simply naming a discipline. It should describe the types of articles the journal seeks (e.g., empirical studies, theoretical papers, case studies), the geographical focus (if any), and the target audience (researchers, practitioners, policymakers, etc.). These details not only shape the journal’s identity but also help attract the right submissions, reviewers, and readership.

Clearly defined objectives further serve as a reference point for evaluating the journal’s progress. Are you building a reputation in a niche area? Are you aiming to increase citation impact, or perhaps expand your readership beyond academia? These goals should inform editorial decisions and strategic planning. Journals that update and realign their aims as the field evolves tend to stay relevant and competitive in a crowded publishing ecosystem.

Building and Maintaining a Competent Editorial Team

Behind every successful journal is a well-functioning editorial team. This includes the editor-in-chief, associate editors, managing editors, section editors, and often a group of advisory board members. Their combined expertise, availability, and integrity directly influence the journal’s quality and reputation.

Recruiting a diverse and experienced editorial board is not just about adding names to a masthead. Editors should be chosen for their subject expertise, editorial experience, and willingness to contribute actively to the journal’s growth. Ideally, the team should reflect geographic, gender, and institutional diversity, which helps to foster a broader range of perspectives and reduce unconscious bias in editorial decisions.

Regular communication among the editorial team is key. Clear editorial policies, workflows, and expectations should be shared from the outset. Editors need training and resources, especially when implementing new technologies or adjusting to shifts in peer review practices. Periodic reviews of editorial performance can also help identify gaps and areas for improvement, ensuring the team remains responsive and professional in their duties.

Establishing Transparent and Fair Peer Review Processes

Peer review remains the gold standard for ensuring the quality and credibility of scholarly publications. That said, the peer review system is under stress from increasing submissions, reviewer fatigue, and, in some cases, abuse. Journals must adopt practices that uphold the integrity of the process while keeping it efficient and fair.

The most common models—single-blind, double-blind, and open peer review—each have their pros and cons. Double-blind remains widely used for its attempt to reduce bias, but more journals are experimenting with transparent or open review models that disclose reviewer identities or publish review reports alongside articles. Whatever model is chosen, consistency is crucial.

Editors must ensure that reviewers are appropriately qualified and that their feedback is constructive and relevant. Implementing structured review forms can help standardize evaluations. Journals should also maintain a healthy reviewer database, regularly updated and segmented by expertise, and should consider recognizing reviewer contributions through certificates, acknowledgment in the journal, or integration with platforms like Publons.

Equally important is setting clear timelines for each stage of the review process. Authors appreciate transparency and timeliness, and a reputation for long delays can deter future submissions. Setting expectations upfront and following up consistently helps keep the review system functional and respectful of everyone’s time.

Prioritizing Ethical Publishing Standards

Ethical considerations in academic publishing are more important than ever. Journals must have clear, publicly available policies on plagiarism, data fabrication, conflict of interest, duplicate submissions, and authorship criteria. Relying solely on authors’ honesty is no longer sufficient; robust checks and accountability mechanisms are now the norm.

Trusted plagiarism tools such as iThenticate) should be used routinely before articles are sent for review. Policies should also address issues such as image manipulation and data falsification, which may require additional checks for high-risk submissions. Editors and reviewers must be trained to detect red flags in manuscripts.

Authorship disputes are another area where proactive policies can prevent misunderstandings. Journals should adopt standard definitions of authorship (such as those by the ICMJE) and require all authors to declare their contributions. It’s also wise to collect conflict of interest disclosures from both authors and reviewers, not just for financial interests, but also professional and personal affiliations that could influence objectivity.

Journals need a transparent investigation and retraction process in cases of ethical breaches, following the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines. Retractions, corrections, and expressions of concern should be handled professionally and prominently displayed to uphold the integrity of the scholarly record.

Improving Discoverability and Indexing

Even the most rigorous and well-managed journal is of limited value if it cannot be found. Ensuring that content is visible, searchable, and accessible is a top priority for modern journals. This involves both technical optimization and strategic positioning.

First and foremost, journals should maintain high-quality metadata. Every article should include clear titles, abstracts, keywords, author affiliations, and ORCID identifiers. Consistency and accuracy in metadata make it easier for articles to be indexed by databases, harvested by aggregators, and discovered by search engines.

Journals must also actively pursue indexing in top journal databases—Scopus, Web of Science, DOAJ, ERIC, and subject-specific indexes. Each index has its own selection criteria, often including regular publication, citation activity, international diversity, and adherence to editorial best practices. Meeting these criteria is a long game, but the increased visibility and credibility are well worth the effort.

Optimizing journal websites for SEO is another powerful tool. Use descriptive URLs, include alt text for images, and structure article pages so that search engines can easily crawl and rank them. Moreover, integration with social sharing tools and scholarly repositories can amplify reach. In today’s digital world, discoverability is not optional—it’s the backbone of scholarly influence.

Streamlining Production and Publication Workflows

The mechanics of turning a manuscript into a published article may be invisible to readers, but they are crucial to the journal’s efficiency and professionalism. Clear production workflows minimize errors, reduce delays, and contribute to a smooth author experience.

Modern journals increasingly rely on submission and peer review management systems like Editorial Manager, ScholarOne, or Open Journal Systems. These platforms centralize communication, automate routine tasks, and allow for better tracking and reporting. Choosing the right system depends on journal size, budget, and editorial complexity, but investing in the right infrastructure can dramatically improve operations.

Best practices in managing academic journals - Workflow

Copyediting, layout, and typesetting should not be rushed. These steps ensure clarity, consistency, and adherence to the journal’s style. While some journals maintain in-house production teams, others outsource to vendors or freelancers. Regardless of the model, strong communication and quality control are vital. It’s also becoming more common to publish articles online as “ahead of print” to reduce time to publication, which benefits authors and readers alike.

Beyond layout, consider the formats offered: HTML and XML versions improve accessibility and machine readability, while PDF remains the gold standard for archiving. Journals should also assign DOIs (Digital Object Identifiers) to every article and ensure long-term preservation through services like LOCKSS or Portico.

Fostering Author and Reader Engagement

Publishing is not a one-way street. Successful journals actively engage their authors and readers community to build loyalty, encourage submissions, and extend their influence. Author satisfaction, in particular, can directly affect a journal’s reputation and submission pipeline.

Start with responsiveness. Journals that communicate clearly and promptly with authors—during submission, review, revision, and post-publication—earn goodwill. Providing tools like article-level metrics, citation tracking, and sharing dashboards helps authors understand their article’s impact and encourages them to share it more widely.

For readers, engagement can take many forms. Consider launching a blog or social media presence to highlight new articles and engage in conversations around key themes. Offering multimedia content like author videos, infographics, or podcast interviews can also broaden appeal. Some journals host webinars or virtual special issues to bring the community together.

Creating a sense of community around the journal, through calls for papers, editorial commentaries, or reader surveys, turns passive audiences into active participants. In a crowded information landscape, this relational aspect becomes a competitive edge.

Embracing Innovation and Continuous Improvement

Journal management should never become a static process. The best journals continually experiment, assess, and adapt. They review metrics not just for performance but for insight. They listen to feedback from authors, reviewers, and readers, and they explore new publishing models when the old ones no longer serve.

Innovation doesn’t always require radical change. Simple steps like piloting a new peer review format, experimenting with altmetrics, or offering preprint-friendly policies can make a journal more agile and attractive. Collaborating with research communities, academic societies, or publishing networks can also unlock fresh opportunities for growth and relevance.

It’s also important to build a culture of learning within the editorial team. Attend publishing workshops, follow developments in scholarly communication, and participate in professional networks. Journals that embrace a mindset of continuous improvement are more resilient and more likely to thrive in a complex, evolving ecosystem.

Conclusion

Managing an academic journal today is no small task. It demands a careful blend of editorial discernment, technical proficiency, ethical vigilance, and community-building skills. But it also presents an extraordinary opportunity: to shape the scholarly dialogue in your field, to set benchmarks for quality and integrity, and to contribute to a vibrant, global knowledge infrastructure.

Instituting best practices in journal management isn’t just about compliance or efficiency. It’s about excellence. From defining a strong editorial identity to ensuring ethical standards, from enhancing discoverability to engaging your audience, every element contributes to a journal’s success and impact. As the publishing landscape continues to evolve, those journals that lead with transparency, innovation, and professionalism will not only survive but set the pace for others to follow.

Leave a comment