Introduction For decades, the academic world treated open access as a moral victory. The logic seemed simple enough: remove paywalls, make research freely available, accelerate discovery, and allow scientific knowledge to circulate without financial barriers. Universities supported it, funders mandated it, researchers complied, and publishers adapted. Billions of dollars were poured into the transition under … Read more
Introduction For years, the conversation around artificial intelligence in academic publishing has been framed in the most predictable way possible. AI will make things faster. Faster peer review. Faster copyediting. Faster production. Faster publishing. It is a comforting narrative. It suggests continuity. It implies that the system itself remains intact, only accelerated. That narrative is … Read more
Introduction For decades, academic publishing has operated on a relatively stable economic logic. Publishers produce, curate, and distribute scholarly content. In return, they earn revenue through subscriptions, licensing agreements with libraries, and, more recently, article processing charges tied to open access. It is a model built around access. Access to journals. Access to databases. Access … Read more
Introduction Academic publishing has always been a bit of a labyrinth. It’s an ancient ecosystem of peer review, high-impact journals, and the relentless “publish or perish” mantra. Now, toss in the disruptive and wildly efficient force of artificial intelligence, and suddenly, that labyrinth has sprouted rocket engines and a self-driving navigation system. The question isn’t … Read more
Introduction The publishing world has always been a rather slow-moving beast, preferring the smell of old paper and the quiet contemplation of the editing desk to the chaotic, breakneck speed of technological revolution. For centuries, the process has remained fundamentally the same: an author writes, an editor polishes, a publisher prints, and a distributor sells. … Read more