How academics use AI

How Academics Use AI

by

Table of Contents

Introduction

Artificial intelligence was once the stuff of sci-fi movies and dystopian novels. Fast forward to today, and it has morphed into something far more mundane, yet no less powerful. AI has become deeply ingrained in the heart of academic life, transforming how research is conducted, papers are written, and classrooms are managed.

Gone are the days when academics had to pore over microfiche and index cards for weeks to find relevant research. AI tools can now sweep through oceans of academic literature in seconds. However, beyond literature searches, the academic world has been discovering various creative and, in some cases, controversial ways to integrate AI into daily workflows.

The write-up examines how academics use AI across research, writing, teaching, and beyond, showing both the transformative power of these tools and the thorny issues they raise.

AI in Academic Research

One of the earliest and most profound impacts of AI in academia has been on research itself. Researchers no longer need to spend months manually searching for articles or datasets. AI-powered research assistants, such as Semantic Scholar, Research Rabbit, and Scite, help scholars discover papers and identify citation connections faster than ever before.

These platforms utilise natural language processing (NLP) algorithms to comprehend the context of a research question, surfacing studies that would otherwise remain hidden in obscure databases. Some even offer citation analysis, enabling scholars to track the evolution of ideas across disciplines.

AI also assists in data analysis, especially in fields where large datasets are common. Tools like IBM SPSS Modeler and Google’s AutoML enable academics to crunch numbers, detect patterns, and even run predictive models without needing to write a single line of code. For many, this has lowered the barrier to entry for advanced statistical analysis, enabling scholars from traditionally qualitative fields, such as education and sociology, to venture into quantitative research.

But the use of AI in research isn’t just about speed. It’s also about precision. AI algorithms can detect subtle patterns in data that human eyes might overlook. In climate science, for instance, machine learning models accurately predict weather patterns and assess environmental risks. Similarly, in biomedical research, AI tools are being used to map genomes and identify potential drug compounds. These tasks would be nearly impossible without advanced computational assistance.

AI in Academic Writing

AI writing tools have become both a blessing and a battleground in academia. Tools like ChatGPT, Grammarly, and Quillbot are used by scholars to draft, edit, and refine their papers. These tools can suggest more effective sentence structures, correct grammatical errors, and even propose alternative phrasings to enhance clarity.

Some academics rely on AI to generate abstracts, summaries of long documents or to create preliminary drafts of grant proposals. Others use it to rephrase text in a more formal or technical tone, aligning their writing with the expectations of a journal.

However, the ethics of AI-assisted writing remain a topic of hot debate. Is it acceptable for a scholar to use AI to draft parts of a paper? Where should the line be drawn between assistance and ghostwriting? Some universities have issued guidelines, while others are still catching up with the rapid rise of AI tools.

One particularly controversial area involves AI-powered translation. Researchers publishing in English but writing in their native languages often use tools like DeepL or Google Translate to produce English drafts. These tools have undergone significant improvements in quality, often producing results that rival those of human translators. But issues arise when nuances are lost or when scholars use translation tools without properly editing the output, risking awkward phrasing or even inaccuracies in their work.

AI in Literature Reviews and Systematic Reviews

AI has become indispensable for literature reviews, particularly systematic reviews, which require exhaustive and unbiased searches of existing research. Manually sifting through thousands of papers used to take months, sometimes years. Now, AI tools can assist in screening, categorizing, and extracting data from studies.

Applications like Covidence, Rayyan, and Abstrackr enable researchers to upload citation data and utilise AI algorithms to identify studies that meet specific inclusion criteria. Some tools can even highlight key passages or suggest thematic groupings for qualitative synthesis.

Machine learning-based tools can also detect duplicate studies and flag potential retractions or questionable research, reducing the risk of including unreliable findings. This makes the review process more efficient and arguably more rigorous.

Yet, these tools are not without limitations. AI can struggle with ambiguous inclusion criteria or nuanced research questions that require deep subject knowledge. Thus, most academics use these tools as aids rather than replacements for human judgment.

AI for Data Collection and Fieldwork

Fieldwork and data collection have also been revolutionized by AI. In the social sciences, chatbots and digital surveys powered by AI allow researchers to collect responses with adaptive questioning techniques. These tools can adjust questions based on previous answers, creating a more natural and engaging experience for participants.

In disciplines like archaeology and environmental studies, drones equipped with AI-powered image recognition analyze landscapes, detect anomalies, and map excavation sites. These methods allow scholars to collect data from areas that are too dangerous or remote to visit in person.

Meanwhile, wearable devices and mobile apps track physiological and behavioral data in real-time for psychological and medical studies. AI algorithms help process this influx of data, identifying trends and anomalies that could signal meaningful insights.

Of course, these approaches raise ethical concerns about privacy, consent, and surveillance. Researchers must navigate strict ethical review processes and ensure participants are fully informed about how their data is collected and analyzed.

AI-Powered Teaching and Learning

AI is not just changing research; it’s reshaping how academics teach. Universities worldwide have adopted AI-driven learning platforms that provide personalized feedback, automate grading, and even offer predictive analytics to identify students at risk of dropping out.

Systems like Gradescope and Turnitin automate the grading of essays and problem sets. They not only save time but also provide more consistent feedback across large classes. Adaptive learning platforms such as Coursera’s AI-based recommendation engine suggest tailored learning paths based on a student’s performance, helping them master difficult concepts at their own pace.

In language learning, AI chatbots simulate conversation partners, allowing students to practice speaking without fear of judgment. Similarly, virtual labs powered by AI offer science students hands-on experience without the need for expensive physical equipment.

AI also supports accessibility in education. Tools like Otter.ai and Microsoft’s Immersive Reader transcribe lectures, helping students with learning disabilities access course content more effectively.

However, some critics argue that AI-driven education risks reducing learning to a mere transaction. When algorithms dictate what and how students learn, there’s a risk of homogenizing education, stifling creativity, and marginalizing non-mainstream perspectives.

AI in Academic Administration

Behind the scenes, AI is increasingly used in university administration. Chatbots handle routine inquiries about admissions, financial aid, and campus services, freeing up staff to focus on more complex tasks. AI tools also optimize course scheduling and resource allocation, ensuring that classrooms and labs are used efficiently.

Some universities utilise AI to predict enrollment trends and allocate their budgets accordingly. Others use it for faculty performance reviews, analyzing metrics such as publication output, student evaluations, and grant success rates.

While these applications can make administrative processes more efficient, they also raise thorny questions about surveillance and academic freedom. Faculty members often push back against metrics-driven performance reviews, arguing that they reduce complex work to simplistic numbers.

Moreover, AI-driven decision-making in admissions or hiring processes has been criticized for perpetuating biases. Algorithms trained on historical data can perpetuate existing inequities unless they are carefully audited and adjusted.

AI in Peer Review and Publishing

Perhaps the most contentious area where AI has entered academia is in peer review and publishing. Some journals now use AI tools to screen manuscripts for plagiarism, data fabrication, and even statistical errors. Tools like iThenticate and StatReviewer automate initial checks, flagging potential issues before papers are sent to human reviewers.

AI can also assist with reviewer selection by analyzing manuscript topics and suggesting potential experts. This can expedite the notoriously slow peer review process and alleviate reviewer fatigue.

Some journals have even experimented with using AI to generate initial review reports, highlighting sections that require clarification or additional evidence. While these tools are meant to aid human reviewers, their use has sparked debate about quality and fairness.

In academic publishing more broadly, AI is used to optimize search engine visibility, suggest keywords, and streamline production workflows. Publishers also use AI to recommend related articles to readers, boosting engagement and citation metrics.

Yet, with every benefit comes risk. AI-driven peer review could inadvertently favor mainstream perspectives, overlooking innovative or unconventional work. Worse, it could be manipulated by bad actors who learn to game the algorithms.

Ethical Challenges and Concerns

As AI becomes more entrenched in academia, ethical concerns are mounting. Bias in AI algorithms can reproduce or even amplify societal inequalities. A classic example is facial recognition software that performs poorly on individuals with darker skin tones; similar biases can crop up in academic tools trained on skewed datasets.

There’s also the issue of accountability. When an AI tool makes a mistake—misclassifies a study, generates misleading text, or flags a non-existent error—who is responsible? The researcher? The software developer? The university?

Moreover, the ease of use of AI tools risks making academics overly reliant on automation. If researchers stop critically engaging with their work because the AI “takes care of it,” the quality of scholarship could erode over time.

The Future of AI in Academia

Despite the challenges, few expect AI to disappear from academia anytime soon. In fact, its use is likely to grow as tools become more sophisticated and accessible.

Some predict that AI will lead to “hyper-personalized” education, where every student receives a fully customized curriculum based on their skills, goals, and learning style. Others envision a future where AI acts as a research co-pilot, handling mundane tasks and allowing scholars to focus on high-level thinking.

Open-source AI models are also gaining traction, allowing researchers to fine-tune tools for specific disciplines or datasets. This could democratize access to advanced AI technologies and reduce dependence on commercial platforms.

Of course, this bright future depends on responsible implementation. Academics, institutions, and software developers must work together to establish ethical standards, safeguard privacy, and ensure that AI serves as a tool for empowerment, not exploitation.

Conclusion

AI is no longer a futuristic gimmick in academia; it has become a fundamental part of how knowledge is produced, disseminated, and consumed. From speeding up literature reviews to automating administrative tasks, AI offers powerful advantages that save time and expand possibilities.

But with great power comes great responsibility. The academic world must remain vigilant about the biases, ethical dilemmas, and unintended consequences that come with AI adoption. Used wisely, AI can enhance academic work. Used carelessly, it could compromise the very integrity of scholarship.

One thing is certain: the academics of tomorrow will not be asking, “Should we use AI?” They’ll be asking, “How can we use AI better?”

Leave a comment