How Do Journals Select Their Editorial Boards?

Table of Contents


How do journals select their editorial boards? Selecting the right editorial board is one of a journal’s most important decisions. The editorial board plays a crucial role in upholding the journal’s standards, shaping its direction, and attracting high-quality submissions.

Given the significance of this task, it’s not surprising that many publishers and journals devote considerable time and effort to carefully selecting their editorial boards.

How do journals select their editorial boards

This write-up will take a behind-the-scenes look at this intricate process. How exactly do journals identify, evaluate, and select candidates for their editorial boards? What criteria do they use, and what challenges do they commonly encounter?

By breaking down the steps at each stage, we’ll uncover what goes into building an editorial board that can take a journal to the next level.

Ultimately, the goal is to highlight the care and diligence journals put into choosing editorial boards that align with their values and vision. After all, there are so many academic journals in this world, and it takes monumental effort to stand out from the other journals.

The composition and competence of a journal’s editorial board have a major influence on its reputation, readership, and ability to publish outstanding research. That’s why understanding the selection process provides key insights into what separates prestigious, highly-selective journals from their less reputable counterparts.

The Importance of Journals in Academic Publishing

Journals play a pivotal role in the world of academic publishing. They are the primary vehicle for disseminating new research findings, theories, and ideas across various disciplines. By offering a platform for researchers to share their work, journals advance knowledge and stimulate further inquiry.

The peer-review process is a cornerstone of academic journal publishing. This rigorous evaluation by experts in the field ensures that only high-quality, credible, and original research gets published. It’s a critical quality control mechanism that maintains the integrity of academic work and helps prevent the spread of false or misleading information.

Moreover, journals provide a means of recognition and validation for researchers. Having one’s work published in a reputable journal can enhance a researcher’s professional reputation, increase their visibility within the academic community, and open up opportunities for collaboration and funding.

Lastly, journals significantly impact the direction of research within a discipline. A journal’s editorial policies and decisions can influence what topics are important, which methodologies are valid, and how research findings are interpreted. Thus, selecting a journal’s editorial board is not just about maintaining quality; it’s also about shaping the discipline’s future.

Reputable databases such as the Web of Science also assess the credibility and credentials of the editorial team as part of the criteria when deciding to index a journal into its databases.

Selecting the Editorial Board is an Important Task

Appointing an editorial board is one of the most important tasks that journal editors face. It’s a lengthy, multi-step process that involves identifying qualified candidates, carefully evaluating them, and selecting the right mix of editors to meet the journal’s needs.

A journal’s editorial board plays a central role in shaping the publication’s quality and direction. The board is responsible for establishing rigorous standards, vetting submissions, and upholding the journal’s reputation.

As such, the composition of the editorial board is critical to attracting high-caliber research, maintaining selectivity, and building credibility within the target field. Journals invest significant effort in editorial selection to ensure their boards have the expertise and diversity needed to guide the publication to success.

Understanding the Editorial Board

An editorial board is a group of experts who oversee a scholarly journal’s publication and editorial processes. They play a critical role in upholding the journal’s standards, scope, and policies. The main responsibilities of an editorial board include:

Reviewing Submissions

One of the editorial board’s most important duties is to review journal submissions through peer review. They assess manuscripts’ quality, relevance, and contribution and provide constructive feedback to authors. Board members leverage their expertise in the subject area to determine if a submission merits publication.

Making Publication Decisions

After the peer review process, the editorial board discusses the reviewers’ comments and votes on whether to accept or reject a manuscript for publication. The editor-in-chief makes the final publication decision based on the board’s recommendations.

Setting Editorial Direction

The editorial board shapes the overall editorial direction and scope of the journal. They advise on policies regarding article types, subject areas, and methodologies appropriate for the journal. This helps position the journal strategically within the scholarly literature.

Under their expertise, editorial board members can identify emerging research trends and recommend special issue topics. This ensures the journal covers the latest developments in the field.

Recruiting Authors and Reviewers

Board members leverage their professional networks to recruit high-profile authors to submit impactful papers. They also suggest qualified peer reviewers for specific submissions.

Within the editorial board, there are members with specialized roles:


The editor-in-chief oversees all journal operations and has final responsibility for the journal’s policies, quality, and editorial direction.

Associate Editors

Associate editors assist the editor-in-chief by overseeing specific subject areas or article types.

Managing Editor

The managing editor handles day-to-day operations like communication with authors/reviewers, manuscript tracking, production, and publication.

Why the Selection Process Matters

The selection process for a journal’s editorial board is incredibly important, as it directly impacts the quality and reputation of the publication.

A meticulous, thoughtful selection process results in an editorial board of respected, knowledgeable members from diverse backgrounds. This, in turn, lends credibility to the journal and attracts high-quality manuscript submissions.

The main duty of an editorial board is to ensure the journal maintains high standards through the peer review process. They must identify qualified reviewers to provide expert feedback on submissions and make fair publication decisions.

A distinguished editorial board signals that submitted manuscripts will receive a rigorous, impartial review. This encourages researchers to submit their work to the journal, increasing submissions and readership.

Furthermore, the editorial board shapes the direction and focus of the journal through its expertise in the field. An editorial board with members from various specializations can provide diverse perspectives during peer review. This leads to well-rounded feedback on manuscripts and prevents narrow concentration on select topics. Appointing editorial board members who are leaders in their niches also attracts cutting-edge submissions in those areas.

In addition, prominent names on the editorial board bring prestige and visibility to the journal. Granted, top journals like Nature, Science and The New England Journal of Medicine comprise outstanding experts on their editorial boards.

Well-respected researchers lend their reputation to the publication simply by being associated with it. This elevates the journal’s standing and draws attention from the academic community. A high-profile editorial board indicates that the journal is worth reading and publishing in.

In summary, carefully selecting editorial board members is crucial because it directly impacts a journal’s credibility, reputation and readership. The board shapes the publication’s direction and quality through oversight of the peer review process.

Their expertise, diversity and reputation attract manuscript submissions and discerning readers. A distinguished editorial board is the foundation of a successful academic journal.

Criteria for Selecting Journal Editorial Board

Selecting the right editorial board members is crucial for establishing a reputable, high-quality journal. The criteria used during the selection process aim to ensure that the board is composed of respected experts who are committed to upholding rigorous standards.

Experience and Expertise

A primary consideration is the experience and expertise potential editorial board members hold in the journal’s subject area. Seasoned academics who are recognized leaders in their field demonstrate the knowledge needed to evaluate submissions, offer constructive feedback to authors, and set strategic direction for the journal.

Board members should have strong publication records reflecting their competence in the topics covered. Hands-on experience conducting research, reviewing papers, and serving on other editorial boards is also valued.

Diversity of Perspectives

Journals seek diversity across their editorial boards to represent varied backgrounds and specializations related to the publication’s scope. This diversity of perspectives enhances discourse and allows editors to make well-rounded publication decisions.

Board members may be selected to provide methodological diversity, global representation, interdisciplinary views, and demographic variety. Aim for balance rather than uniformity.

Commitment and Responsiveness

Willingness to regularly contribute time and effort is an important consideration when selecting the board. Members should be responsive and engaged in their roles as reviewers and advisors.

Look for candidates who are enthusiastic about the journal’s mission and demonstrate commitment through their record of service to other publications in the field.

The Selection Process: Step by Step

Selecting the right individuals to serve on a journal’s editorial board is a multi-step process that requires careful consideration at each stage. Here is an overview of the key steps involved:

Candidate Identification

The first step is to generate a list of potential candidates. Journals may invite nominations or proactively seek out individuals based on factors like research experience, reputation, and alignment with the journal’s aims and scope. Professional networks, academic conferences, and internal recommendations are good sources to identify qualified candidates.

Initial Screening

Once a list of prospects has been compiled, journals conduct an initial screening. This involves reviewing each candidate’s CV, publications, and background to determine if they have the appropriate credentials and expertise. Attention is paid to their experience as authors, reviewers, and editors for other journals in the field.

Interview Stage

Candidates who clear the initial screening are invited for detailed interviews. This allows the selection panel to deeply evaluate qualifications, commitment, work ethic, and fit for the journal. Interviews may happen via video call or in person. Candidates are asked about their interests, abilities, and vision for the journal.

Reference Checks

Before finalizing appointments, journals often conduct reference checks by contacting peers, co-authors, or editors the candidate has previously worked with. This provides external validation of the candidate’s qualifications, achievements, and working style.

Final Decision

Ultimately, the selection committee reviews notes and feedback from all the previous stages to make final decisions on new editorial board members. The goal is to create a diverse, balanced team that brings complementary skills and experiences to the journal.

Careful completion of this multi-step process allows journals to assemble editorial boards that maintain high standards, uphold the journal’s reputation, and contribute to its ongoing success.

Challenges in the Selection Process

Selecting the right individuals for a journal’s editorial board can be challenging. Journals often face difficulties finding qualified candidates who meet all the desired criteria and are willing to commit the necessary time. Some common challenges include:

Identifying Suitable Candidates

Journals may struggle to identify enough potential editorial board members, particularly those with expertise in niche or emerging fields. Broad outreach and networking are crucial to building a strong candidate pool.

Ensuring Diversity

Creating a diverse editorial board with members from different backgrounds, demographics, and geographic regions is important but can be difficult to achieve. Proactive efforts to include underrepresented groups are key.

Evaluating Candidates

Evaluating each candidate’s qualifications, experience, and fit for the journal is time-consuming. Developing standardized criteria and processes can help streamline this task.

Managing Commitments

Editorial board roles require a substantial time commitment. Ensuring candidates understand and can meet expectations is critical to avoid issues down the line.

Strategies to Overcome Challenges

Journals can employ various strategies to address these selection challenges:

  • Leveraging professional networks and academic conferences to identify potential candidates.
  • Actively recruiting from underrepresented groups and institutions.
  • Using standardized application and interview processes to evaluate candidates effectively.
  • Communicating time commitments and expectations upfront.
  • Offering incentives like professional development opportunities and recognition.
  • Building a diverse pipeline of potential future editorial board members.

With careful planning and a proactive approach, journals can assemble strong, diverse editorial boards despite the inherent challenges.

The Impact of Effective Editorial Boards

In summary, selecting an effective editorial board is crucial for the success of academic journals. As we have seen, editorial boards play a vital role in upholding the quality and reputation of journals.

The editorial board is responsible for ensuring rigorous peer review, selecting impactful articles for publication, and providing strategic guidance. Given this immense responsibility, the selection process must be thorough and objective in identifying qualified candidates.

The selection process involves carefully evaluating nominees based on criteria such as subject matter expertise, experience, commitment level, and diversity of background.

The goal is to assemble a well-rounded board with members complementing each other’s strengths. Additionally, it is important to have members from diverse fields and specializations to get fresh perspectives and insights.

While the selection process can be challenging, taking the time to get it right has a monumental impact on the journal. A distinguished editorial board of respected scholars and professionals boosts the journal’s credibility and gives it instant name recognition. This facilitates attracting high-quality manuscript submissions, expanding readership, and cementing the journal’s reputation.

In closing, academic journals live and die by the strengths of their editorial boards. The board is the lifeblood determining whether a journal will thrive or flounder. This underscores why an objective, thoughtful selection process is indispensable. By diligently vetting candidates and assembling the best team, journals can build an editorial board that steers them to success.

3 thoughts on “How Do Journals Select Their Editorial Boards?”

Leave a comment