Zul M 
Introduction Peer review has long been upheld as the cornerstone of academic integrity—the mechanism by which scholarship earns its badge of legitimacy. For centuries, this process has served as the gatekeeper of knowledge, distinguishing rigorously vetted research from the merely speculative. Yet, as the scholarly publishing ecosystem grows more commercialized and digitized, peer review finds … Read more
Introduction AI has already revolutionized language translation, image generation, and content recommendation. But publishing? That was supposed to be safe—the sacred domain of human creativity, judgment, and nuance. Unfortunately (or thrillingly, depending on your vantage point), AI publishing is no longer a quirky experiment—it’s a full-blown industrial shift. Today, AI isn’t just involved in publishing; … Read more
Introduction The world of scholarly publishing is brimming with buzzwords that often sound interchangeable. “Open access” and “open science” are two of the most prominent—and most misunderstood—terms in this lexicon. At first glance, they may seem to describe the same noble ideal: a more transparent, democratic system for disseminating research. But scratch the surface, and … Read more
Introduction Open access (OA) was once the rebellious outsider of academic publishing—the scrappy alternative to expensive journal subscriptions that locked publicly funded research behind paywalls. Fast forward to 2025, and OA is no longer a fringe movement. It’s the new standard—but not without growing pains, contradictions, and a fair share of chaos. From policy frameworks … Read more
Introduction The creative landscape isn’t just changing—it’s morphing into something altogether new. Authors, once solitary warriors of the written word, now find themselves navigating a world where artificial intelligence isn’t just a tool, but an active collaborator. Some welcome this evolution with open arms, using AI to ideate, draft, revise, and market with unprecedented efficiency. … Read more